Is there a Mitzvah of Simcha

        BS"D

from http://mail-jewish.org/simcha.txt

Is There a Mitzva To Be B'simcha (happy) constantly ?       
                              
In recent years, a 'saying, "mitzva gedola lihiyos b'simcha tamid" (It
is a great mitzva to be always joyous) has become well known and oft -
quoted. It is not a new saying, but probably due to being put to music
in recent years and (an)other factor(s), it has become a very popular
saying. Some seem to think that it is an ancient Jewish teaching -
perhaps from the gemara (Talmud) or another unimpeachable classic
ancient Jewish source. That is not the case, however. The source of the
saying is, to my knowledge, the leader of the Breslov (or Bratzlav)
chassidic group, R. Nachman, who lived approximately 200 years ago. Such
a formulation does not appear earlier than that, to my knowledge. With
that in mind, I think it is appropriate and in order to try to examine
if this is an undisputed and indisputable teaching accepted by all
Jewish authorities, despite their not expressing such, or perhaps their
refraining from expressing such a belief for so long, indicates
otherwise.

           Questions On 'Mitzva Gedola Lihiyos B'Simcha Tamid'   

(1) What is the source of this supposed mitzvah?

      Many would point to 'ivdu es Hashem b'simcha' (serve Hashem with
joy) of Tehillim (Psalms) 100:2 and similar verses. However, that /
those verse(s) speak(s) of serving Hashem with joy - not being joyous in
and of itself. This distinction, although seeming very fine, should not
be ignored, in my opinion. What may seem to be fine distinctions /
nuances in Torah verses can be of great import.

(2) If this is a mitzvah (commandment), why do the classic enumerators
of the 613 mitzvos not count this as such? There is a Biblical mitzvah
of Simcha on certain yomim tovim (holidays) that is enumerated, I
believe, but not such a mitzva that applies constantly. In fact, even
the mitzva of simcha on holidays is only fulfilled by action, e.g.eating
meat from karban shelamim (sacrifice), etc., and not just by being in a
certain state of mind. This is quite significant in that it shows that
(1) when there is a mitzva of simcha, it involves more than just thought
/ feelings / emotions and (2) there is no such mitzvah seemingly, at
other times.

                Conflicting Statements / Sources
                                                
(1) One of the great early hassidic leaders, R. Aharon of Karlin, is
reported to have stated 'there is no mitzvah to be b'simcha, but simcha
can bring one to the greatest mitzvos and there is no aveira
(prohibition) to be be'atzvus (in a state of sadness), but atzvus can
bring one to the greatest aveiros' (or similar). Here one sees a great
hassidic leader, contemporary to (slightly earlier I believe) R.
Nachman, saying that there is no mitzvah to be b'simcha!

(2) Rav Yosef Gikatilla (a great Sephardic Rishon - early authority -
circa 1200's C.E.) says in his Sefer Hamishalim (book of Parables) the
following ( # 97) - He compares simcha to day and atzvus (sadness) to
night, saying that simcha's effect is to light up a person, similar to
the sun lighting up the day and atzvus darkens a person like darkness
darkens the night. He continues by saying that just as it is impossible
to have (only) (day) light always, with no periods of night (darkness),
so it is impossible to have (always) only simcha without atzvus
(sadness).

(3) Rabbenu Bachayay (a great early commentator) says in his classic
'Kad HaKemach' - There is Simcha that is assur (prohibited) min haTorah
(Biblically). Somewhat less than R.Nachman's unequivocal enthusiastic
advocacy of simcha.  It is also written, I believe, that simcha tmidis
eina simcha - a constant simcha is not simcha! (I don't have the source
right now - help would be appreciated).

(4) Shlomo Hamelech (King Solomon, wisest of men) says in Koheles
(Ecclesiastes) 2:2 "UliSimcha-ma zo osa?" - As for Happiness - what
(good) does it accomplish? Rashi comments - what good does it do, being
that letdown follows in it's wake.  Here the wisest of all men,
questions the value of simcha. The gemara (Talmud) in Maseches Shabbos
30b explains this verse (in contrasting it to Koheles 8:15, where Simcha
is praised) as referring to Simcha sheaina shel mitzvah (non - mitzvah
related joy). In other words, Simcha (Joy / Happiness) of a mitzva is
praiseworthy - Simcha not of a mitzva is not.

  Another statement critical of simcha is in Koheles 7:4 where it is
stated "Lev chachamim b'veis eivel v'lev ksilim b'veis simcha"- The
heart of the wise is in a house of mourning and the heart of the fool in
a house of happiness (simcha).  We see clearly that the wisest of men
clearly does not consider simcha to be always and unequivocally
desirable / praiseworthy - rather he considers certain simcha
praiseworthy and other simcha worthy of criticism / disdain.

Another statement critical of simcha is found in Mishlei (Proverbs)
21:17 where Shlomo says "Ish machsor ohev simcha"- a deficient person
loves happiness.

            Why There May Be No Mitzvah To Be B'simcha   

Perhaps there may not be a mitzva to be b'simcha because (1) As shown
above, not all simcha is desirable (2) Simcha (joy / happiness) is not
considered a desirable end / goal in and of itself. Rather, it is
something that must go together with / be derived from mitzva
activity. Having an independent / stand alone mitzva to be b'simcha
might be interpreted as making simcha a goal / end in and of itself,
rather than an adjunct / by product to / of mitzva activity.

             What Brings Desirable Simcha? Some Ways 

Examination of Psukim (Biblical verses) that mention Simcha positively,
show that (1) Straightness - There is a connection between yashrus
(straightness) and simcha. Being straight / righteous brings simcha, as
is stated [Tehillim (Psalms) 97:11] "Uliyishrei lev simcha" - to the
straight of heart is joy.  This is also evident in the pasuk (Tehillim
19:9) "pikudei hashem yesharim mesamchei lev" - the precepts of Hashem
are straight and heart gladdening. A straight person with a clear
conscience is naturally inclined to happiness.
      

   (2) Proper Torah study (as per Tehillim 19:9, as above).

             Conclusion - Summing Up         
                                                                              
               
As it appears to me, the Jewish attitude to simcha (happiness) is
nuanced. Proper simcha, though not a mitzva, can be desirable /
praiseworthy. Other simcha is undesirable, even forbidden. One should
beware of overly exalting simcha and making / proclaiming 'simcha' a
major thrust of one's Judaism. Let us not forget the classic Rabbinic
dictum "Kol hamosif goreia" (whoever adds, actually subtracts). If
Hashem did not make something a mitzvah, it is presumed to have been for
good reason and we are forbidden to put it in that category.

P.S. Re a related subject - Some people who believe 'mitzvah gedola
lihiyos bisimcha tamid' seem to think as well, as a corollary of the
above perhaps, that sadness and shame are always viewed negatively and
as undesirable by Judaism. Re shame - That is incorrect, as classical
Jewish sources praise shame and bashfullness highly - though not
excessive shame / shyness.

Re atzvus (sadness) - some seem to think that it's always, totally
undesirable. However, we know that everything Hashem made was for a
purpose (see last statement in Pirkei Avos).There is a time for
everything (Koheles).  Atzvus may have it's proper place in the world in
aiding a choteh (sinner) and spurring him to do teshuva
(repentance). Those who seem to want to banish it entirely remind me of
a Midrashic teaching where Chazal say that Dovid haMelech (King David)
wondered why Hashem created shigaon (insanity) - he wondered what useful
purpose it serves - who needs it? He was later shown that he would have
need for it - when 'L'Dovid bishanoso es taamo lifnei avimelech
vayigarishehu vayeloch' (Tehillim 34) - He was only able to escape
unharmed from the jaws of King Avimelech by feigning insanity
(parenthetically, this account is somewhat similar to a story related by
Chazal re Dovid hamelech o"h questioning why Hashem had created spiders
and the need for them in the world - which ends with him similarly shown
not to question G-d in that manner and being saved by Hashem from his
enemy via a spider [web]).

Similarly, in my opinion, those who think that atzvus has no proper
place in the world, are repeating the mistake of Dovid hamelech and
should realize that G-d created everything for a reason.

            Wisom of the Wise of the Nations re Simcha

I have come across the following quotes from general non - Jewish
literature, which I think are enlightening on the subject. In the spirit
of the Talmudic teaching that 'chochma bagoyim taamin' [if someone tells
you that there is wisdom among the nations, you should believe them] ),
I am mentioing them here.

"Happiness is a butterfly, which when pursued is just beyond your grasp,
but if you sit down quietly, may alight upon you." - Nathaniel
Hawthorne.

"If only we'd stop trying to be happy we'd have a pretty good time." -
Edith Wharton.

Both of the above seem to express a realization that active pursuit of
and concentration on happiness can actually be counterproductive to it's
attainment.  Perhaps because of the above reasons, some people have been
observed to change the lyrics when the songs were played to 'simcha
gedola lihiyos bimitzvah tomid' (it's a great joy to be always involved
in mitzvah[s])-a reformulation which seemingly avoids the objections
cited above.'

Comment: I agree that there is simcha and there is simcha.

Koheles 2:2 says: To Laughter, I said "Profane!" and to Simchah,"What is this one doing?

The commentators explain that (empty) laughter is always profane but joy needs to be investigated to see what it does, in other words, what kind it is and to what it leads.

Simchas Yom Tov to all!

Comments

[Mordechai]

Great article.

Thanks !

P.S. Since I wrote the version posted above, I have accumulated some additional material related to the subject. Maybe I will jot some of it down and post it later.

[avakesh]

I am glad that proper credit can now be applied. I did list the source but it unfortunately did not contain the author's name. I am glad that between my posting and your response, we can bring geula to the world.

[Mordechai]

Here is one addition to the essay.

Some time ago I heard Rabbi Dr. Tzvi Hirsch Weinreb of the O-U state that R. Nachman's statement was given in the following context -

We are taught that 'mishenichnas Adar marbin besimcha', as well as 'mishenichnas Av mamatin besimcha'. R. Nachman observed that both of those directives just tell one when to increase simcha and when to decrease it - but it is taken as a given that it always exists at some level.

On that basis he proceeded to state 'mitzvoh gedola lihiyos besimcha tomid'.

While the context is illuminating and makes the statement seem less extreme, the concerns about it raised in the essay above are still valid, IMHO.

[kush tif]

Your not only ignorant, but also sadly proud of it.
But, as I respond to those who claim we come from monkeys, that if you want to be from a monkey, be my guest.
If you want to be depressed, be my guest. :)

As for a source, (unimpeachable btw) the Baal Shem Tov taught that the verse of 'ivdu es Hashem b'simcha' really teaches us that How does one Serve G-d? With Joy. That's the chassidic insight into the verse from Tehillim.
Just because you didn't zetz it correctly, doesn't mean the source isn't valid.

[Isaacson]

Unfortunately, this, like other teachings of Rebbi Nachman, is being quoted in error (he also never said "the whole world is a very narrow bridge...", but he did say "sometimes a man must cross a very narrow bridge"). the full text can be found here - http://www.breslov.com/international/likutei_mohoron/lt08.html (likutey moharan tinyana 34). Essentially he is speaking about the importance of being able to gain a perspective that incorporates the shoresh of simchadik event. I think the most telling omission is the lack of the word "tamid-constantly"

[M.R.]

It is clearly written in Sefer Devarim parshas Ki Sova chapter 28 verse 47: “Tachas asher lo ovadita es Hashem elokecha b’simcha uvtov levov morov kol”- because you did not serve G-d, your G-d, with joy and with gladness of heart, when (you had an) abundance of everything. It was for this reason that the Yidden were being condemned and punished. Not everything is about the letter of the law- it goes beyond the law. Judaism is about sensitivities we want to do whatever Hashem wants of us- not just what is written in black and white. The tziddokim followed only what was the written law and they were totally not observing the Torah properly. You are writing this article as if you are serving Hashem like a slave; someone who does what he must do yet you are looking for loopholes to get out of it. We were created for the purpose of serving Hashem and bringing His holiness down to this mundane world. Our duty is to serve Hashem in a manner that will give Him nachas. Do you think not being happy will give Him nachas? Obviously not! So by not being happy you are totally defeating the purpose of your entire existence! Our duty is to serve Hashem every second of the day. When you serve Hashem, not out of happiness you are being oiver on a constant lo sase “ tachas asher lo avaditem….” Being oiver on a negative commandment is just as bad as being oiver on a positive commandment!