One can see many of the issues just by watching this
« What is time? | Main | MaaleVid: Jewish Film School »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345258d569e201156f7806d2970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Geocentric and heliocentric models:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
As implied by that video, geocentrism ended up working by adding epicycle upon epicycle. You can actually describe any path across the sky that way, given enough epicycles. Effectively they were approximating what they saw by creating a Fourier series.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_series
That said, it's not an issue. Being a more complicated description doesn't make geocentrism less true. Showing that the same motion could be described side by side in the same java applet makes the point that this is an example where geocentrism is actually sufficient to explain the data.
-micha
Posted by: Micha | May 05, 2009 at 09:36 AM
And if there were only three objects in the universe, geocentricity might be true. But there's a whole lot of other stuff in the universe, proving that geocentricity is false. If you disagree, try doing what the java app is doing with all the stars in the universe included in the simulation.
Posted by: Give it up | May 05, 2009 at 10:40 AM
"Give it up": Albert Einstein disagrees with you.
Posted by: Joseph | May 08, 2009 at 03:51 PM