« What is time? | Main | MaaleVid: Jewish Film School »

May 04, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345258d569e201156f7806d2970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Geocentric and heliocentric models:

Comments

Micha

As implied by that video, geocentrism ended up working by adding epicycle upon epicycle. You can actually describe any path across the sky that way, given enough epicycles. Effectively they were approximating what they saw by creating a Fourier series.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_series

That said, it's not an issue. Being a more complicated description doesn't make geocentrism less true. Showing that the same motion could be described side by side in the same java applet makes the point that this is an example where geocentrism is actually sufficient to explain the data.

-micha

Give it up

And if there were only three objects in the universe, geocentricity might be true. But there's a whole lot of other stuff in the universe, proving that geocentricity is false. If you disagree, try doing what the java app is doing with all the stars in the universe included in the simulation.

Joseph

"Give it up": Albert Einstein disagrees with you.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment